There's no question that the social
community supporting Humans of New York is overwhelmingly kind and
compassionate and there's no question that I'm not an economist. How do these
two topics relate? It's not conventional and may not be deemed the
"nicest" of ideas but hear me out. Here's some quick food for
thought.
To be
completely, completely honest, I have never been that excited about the idea of
college. Unlike most of my friends, the freedom of college and moving away from
home was not all that thrilling because one, I wasn't planning on doing
anything risky with this newfound freedom (god forbid I go out to party and
drink) and two, at the end of the day, it's just more school. The one part of
college that I was very much looking forward to however, was studying
abroad.
You see, I've
always believed that if you had a job that directly helped others, you would
never regret going to work. Even on the worst work days, you will have some
kind of positive influence on another person's life and how could you ever
regret that?
And that is why
I decided to become a doctor.
Just kidding.
(Long story
short the process of becoming of doctor requires more school and plus, I have
an innate fear of chemistry)
And that is why
I decided to major in engineering.
(Still has some chemistry, but not as much.)
(Still has some chemistry, but not as much.)
With enginering I knew that during my four years in college, I'll have the chance to travel to some far away, less fortunate country, immerse myself in a completely new environment, and help engineer waterways, wells, bridges, whatever and get to do that something good.
But now I'm not
sure if I want to travel abroad because if you think about it a little more
deeply from my un-professional, self-proclaimed profession, economic point of
view, this idea of charity, donations, volunteering, maybe be a little bit....selfish?
As citizens of a
well-to-do world power, we inevitably see ourselves as superior to our
third-world country counterparts. When we see pictures of starving children,
impoverished villages with no electricity, nations torn by war, by disease, we have
a very human instinct to help. And a lot of times when we travel cross seas to
help, we pity the people we are helping. Because they don't have as much as us,
because we see them as in need of our help, because sometimes, when we see their
different lifestyles, we think their lives are not as good as ours. But who are we to judge the lives of others? To envade their culture and label it as in need of help? To march in with our superior complex and say this, this, and this needs to be changed? Because the
bottom line is, philanthropy is not about helping out of pity, it is about
aiding through respect.
"Aiding"
being the key word here. Because unfortunately, philanthropy, traveling to another
country to build a bridge or a well can create this concept called "a
culture of dependence". When we blatantly give material goods or
build infrastructure, we do good yes, but what about in the long run? What if
the goods were stolen? What if the infrastructure falls apart? Do the people
wait for another altruistic group of volunteers to come to the rescue and bring
more goods? Build more infrastructure?
Charity, humanitarian work,
volunteering, should be based on the end goal of building independence for those who need aid. Otherwise what we ultimately
create is a perpetual, never-ending cycle of dependence.
Which brings me to this week’s Humans of
New York photo:
So naturally the good-hearted Facebook community immediately rushes to his aid, offering to raise money for the man. Brandon Stanton's comment on this picture? "The man in the photo has requested that funds not be raised for him. He is in the process of finding a place with his brothers and would like to figure out his living situation on his own, but he thanks everyone so much for their well wishes and thoughts."
So maybe it's not about helping others at all. It's about aiding them, supporting them, and allowing them to help themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment